linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy9TiUb0nXyFNT0ZSxVkpyQme0reB54ZNCQpanof+wqew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:42:55 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen saw a conflict during kselftest merge with next
[..]

There was also a conflict with some of Andrew's new userfaultfd tests.

I'm not at all sure I merged that correctly, although I tried to make
the resolution at least look sane. The odd thing about those new tests
is that it's all the same source file, except built with different
compile-time defines to be different test binaries.

I didn't find any way to do that with any standard selftest makefile
magic, so I just did the build rules by hand.

Somebody should actually verify that it does the right thing, please..
Adding the two Mike's that did those test additions to the participant
list.

                               Linus