lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:37:44 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <>
To:     Linus Torvalds <>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <>,
        Mike Kravetz <>,
        Stephen Rothwell <>,,
        LKML <>,
        "" <>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for 4.11-rc1

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:42:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Shuah Khan <> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen saw a conflict during kselftest merge with next
> [..]
> There was also a conflict with some of Andrew's new userfaultfd tests.
> I'm not at all sure I merged that correctly, although I tried to make
> the resolution at least look sane. The odd thing about those new tests
> is that it's all the same source file, except built with different
> compile-time defines to be different test binaries.
> I didn't find any way to do that with any standard selftest makefile
> magic, so I just did the build rules by hand.
> Somebody should actually verify that it does the right thing, please..
> Adding the two Mike's that did those test additions to the participant
> list.

The userfaultfd_* tests are built and they are working just fine.
Maybe it's worth adding userfaultfd_{hugetlb,shmem}.c which will define the
required defines and include userfaultfd.c?
Than we can get away with only specifying LDFLAGS += -lpthread in the
>                                Linus

Sincerely yours,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists