linux-kernel - Re: Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170227034205.GG7147@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:12:05 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        masahiroy@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings

On 26-02-17, 14:18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> 
> Decumentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
> takes examples like this:
> 
>         opp@...0000000 {
>                 opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
>                 opp-microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>;
>                 opp-microamp = <70000>;
>                 clock-latency-ns = <300000>;
>                 opp-suspend;
>         };
>         opp@...0000000 {
>                 opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>;
>                 opp-microvolt = <980000 1000000 1010000>;
>                 opp-microamp = <80000>;
>                 clock-latency-ns = <310000>;
>         };
>         opp@...0000000 {
>                 opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
>                 opp-microvolt = <1025000>;
>                 clock-latency-ns = <290000>;
>                 turbo-mode;
>         };
> 
> 
> If we follow this notation and the device-tree is built with W=1,
> DTC warns like follows:
> 
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@...0000000 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> 
> Is there a recommended notation to avoid it?
> 
> Maybe, simply omit the "@" ?

I would let Rob suggest something here.

-- 
viresh