[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <58B3B0FD.6070406@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:24:21 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mhiramat@...nel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, brendan.d.gregg@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
wangnan0@...wei.com, jolsa@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
treeze.taeung@...il.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
hekuang@...wei.com, sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ananth@...ibm.com,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf/sdt: Directly record SDT events with 'perf
record'
Looks like I've older address of Masami(masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com) in my database.
Adding To: mhiramat@...nel.org
-Ravi
On Friday 24 February 2017 01:13 PM, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> All events from 'perf list', except SDT events, can be directly recorded
> with 'perf record'. But, the flow is little different for SDT events.
> Probe point for SDT event needs to be created using 'perf probe' before
> recording it using 'perf record'.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists