linux-kernel - Re: ARM: OMAP2+: Grab reference to device nodes where needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:52:47 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Qi Hou <qi.hou@...driver.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ARM: OMAP2+: Grab reference to device nodes where needed

* Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> [170228 09:28]:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:23:16AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> [170227 15:36]:
> > > ping ... this problem is now seen in mainline.
> > 
> > Oops sorry I had accidentally tagged this with "next" instead of
> > "fixes".
> > 
> > Looking at the patch though, can't we make of_node_get/put local to
> > omap3xxx_hwmod_is_hs_ip_block_usable()?
> > 
> Not really.
> 
> Strictly speaking the patch fixes two problems:
> 1) of_find_node_by_name() gets a reference on "bus", thus of_node_put()
>    is necessary to release it. This is the change in omap3xxx_hwmod_init().
> 2) of_find_node_by_name() drops a reference to the passed device node,
>    thus it is necessary to call of_node_get(bus) in
>    omap3xxx_hwmod_is_hs_ip_block_usable().
> 
> I should have stated that more clearly in the description.

OK

> We could ignore 1) to get rid of the warning, but that would leave us with
> a dangling reference to the bus node. I could also improve the description,
> or split the patch in two. Let me know what you prefer.

Once patch is just fine with me.

> Another possible change would be to use of_get_child_by_name() instead of
> of_find_node_by_name(). That would, however, only search immediate children
> of the 'ocp' node, not all nodes. I  think that is what is actually intended
> here, but I am not entirely sure. Thoughts ?

Yes that would be better.

> Either case, turns out I'll have to re-submit the patch because, as mentioned
> above, of_find_node_by_name() gets a reference to the device node it returns,
> so a put on that node is necessary in omap3xxx_hwmod_is_hs_ip_block_usable().

OK

Thanks,

Tony