[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACna6rzX=6MpcuQ8iPa_bLCf6f0UGO0hsHyD1X2pn=s6p=SA7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 21:48:50 +0100
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com>
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT
On 28 February 2017 at 21:46, Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 28 February 2017 at 21:31, Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com> wrote:
>>> @@ -70,10 +70,19 @@
>>> clocks = <&periph_clk>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> - local-timer@...00 {
>>> + timer@...00 {
>>
>> Is there a reason for this rename? I don't really have preference for
>> any name, it's just we shouldn't keep renaming this depending of
>> personal preferences.
>>
>> It also doesn't seem like adjusting to any schema:
>> bcm63138.dtsi uses local-timer@...00
>> bcm-nsp.dtsi uses twd-timer@...00
>> berlin2cd.dtsi uses local-timer@...600
>> berlin2.dtsi uses local-timer@...600
>> berlin2q.dtsi uses local-timer@...600
>
> This was a suggestion from Sergei Shtylyov
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395160.html
Good to know, thanks!
--
Rafał
Powered by blists - more mailing lists