[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC3K-4rCp3K8FDRQOoL5fG+pwM_H6UpKvQWqrNpysgAss--Xcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:46:50 -0500
From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> wrote:
> On 28 February 2017 at 21:31, Jon Mason <jon.mason@...adcom.com> wrote:
>> @@ -70,10 +70,19 @@
>> clocks = <&periph_clk>;
>> };
>>
>> - local-timer@...00 {
>> + timer@...00 {
>
> Is there a reason for this rename? I don't really have preference for
> any name, it's just we shouldn't keep renaming this depending of
> personal preferences.
>
> It also doesn't seem like adjusting to any schema:
> bcm63138.dtsi uses local-timer@...00
> bcm-nsp.dtsi uses twd-timer@...00
> berlin2cd.dtsi uses local-timer@...600
> berlin2.dtsi uses local-timer@...600
> berlin2q.dtsi uses local-timer@...600
This was a suggestion from Sergei Shtylyov
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395160.html
>
>> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
>> - reg = <0x20600 0x100>;
>> - interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + reg = <0x20600 0x20>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) |
>> + IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
>> + clocks = <&periph_clk>;
>> + };
>
> The rest looks OK, thanks! :)
>
> --
> Rafał
Powered by blists - more mailing lists