[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170228231930.GA10193@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:19:30 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] mfd: db8500-prcmu: fix stub helper interface
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:47:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:01:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> When the db8500 watchdog is enabled without the PRCMU, we get a lot of
> >> warnings about duplicate or missing helper functions:
> >>
> >> In file included from drivers/watchdog/ux500_wdt.c:21:0:
> >> include/linux/mfd/dbx500-prcmu.h:422:19: error: redefinition of 'prcmu_abb_read'
> >> static inline int prcmu_abb_read(u8 slave, u8 reg, u8 *value, u8 size)
> >>
> >> This removes the duplicate function definitions and moves the helpers in
> >> dbx500-prcmu outside of the #ifdef that hides them.
> >>
> >
> > Is that appropriate ? Maybe we should just disable COMPILE_TEST
> > for this driver instead.
>
> Or we could do both. The MFD driver was written to support this in principle,
> it just hasn't worked in a long time.
>
Both sounds better to me at this point.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists