[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170228231606.GA9885@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:16:06 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] watchdog: wm831x watchdog really needs mfd
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:48:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> >>> config WM831X_WATCHDOG
> >>> tristate "WM831x watchdog"
> >>> - depends on MFD_WM831X || COMPILE_TEST
> >>> + depends on MFD_WM831X
> >>
> >> I prefer the fix proposed by Randy:
> >>
> >> - depends on MFD_WM831X || COMPILE_TEST
> >> + depends on MFD_WM831X || (MFD_WM831X=y && COMPILE_TEST)
> >>
> >
> > Agreed, that's better.
>
> Actually I misread. They should be completely equivalent, the part after
> the || has no effect here.
>
Yes, I figured that out later as well.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists