[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <502629911.1125748.1488361523729.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 04:45:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
bcodding@...hat.com, asavkov@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] key payload access with just rcu_read_lock()
----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@...hat.com>
> Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, bcodding@...hat.com,
> asavkov@...hat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 March, 2017 10:40:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] key payload access with just rcu_read_lock()
>
> Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > That problem didn't show up with my NFS based reproducer.
> > I re-run it again with latest version of your patch, plus also
> > keyutils testsuite. Both completed OK for me, dmesg looks clean.
>
> Can I put you down as a Tested-by?
Yes. Thanks for having a look at this.
Regards,
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists