linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c835926e-c2bd-8a52-34db-6c605301bc2b@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:38:09 +0100
From:   Milan Broz <gmazyland@...il.com>
To:     Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
Cc:     Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>, Oded <oded.golombek@....com>,
        Ofir <Ofir.Drang@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        Rajendra <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] IV Generation algorithms for dm-crypt


On 03/01/2017 02:04 PM, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 03/01/2017 01:42 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> ...
> 
>> I can certainly understand if you don't wont to take the patch until
>> we have results with
>> dm-crypt itself but the difference between 8 separate invocation of
>> the engine for 512
>> bytes of XTS and a single invocation for 4KB are pretty big.
> 
> Yes, I know it. But the same can be achieved if we just implement
> 4k sector encryption in dmcrypt. It is incompatible with LUKS1
> (but next LUKS version will support it) but I think this is not
> a problem for now.
> 
> If the underlying device supports atomic write of 4k sectors, then
> there should not be a problem.
> 
> This is one of the speed-up I would like to compare with the IV approach,
> because everyone should benefit from 4k sectors in the end.
> And no crypto API changes are needed here.
> 
> (I have an old patch for this, so I will try to revive it.)

If anyone interested, simple experimental patch for larger sector size
(up to the page size) for dmcrypt is in this branch:

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mbroz/linux.git/log/?h=dm-crypt-4k-sector

It would be nice to check what performance gain could be provided
by this simple approach.

Milan