linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] objtool, module: discard _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxLpj2x+VP5DE-N+x6stfMtfZ7ayzCnZhwyuVSEgmj5-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:01:54 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool, module: discard __unreachable section for modules

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:44 AM,  <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> I would like to see a name like, say, ".annot.unreachable", since is odds are pretty high we are going to need more annotations in the future.

Why not just make it ".discard.unreachable", and then make the discard
pattern be ".discard*".

We already have .discard.text for some trace hackery, so it follows a pattern.

And that's what we do for things like .rodata.* etc.

In fact, we already have a pattern for '.discard.*' in the main
vmlinux.lds.h file exactly for the .discard.text case (but not for
modules, it looks like).

               Linus