linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve intel-hid's self-consistency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdXeXmxNP=sy5Tsx3X=9PSpHK65ftPK9sExi_Pt-4ydhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Mar 2017 01:03:14 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc:     Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve intel-hid's self-consistency

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> Commit 2cfa4b311acc ("platform/x86: intel-hid: Support 5 button array")
> contains some coding style cleanups compared to the code it was based
> on.  This patch series "backports" these cleanups to the rest of the
> driver in order to make it more self-consistent and removes a redundant
> set_bit() call as a bonus.
>
> This series was not tested on hardware supported by intel-hid.

Alex, do you have an access to hardware to test? I wouldn't going to
apply this until I get your tag(s) (in the best case
Reviewed-and-tested-by).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko