lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 18:17:44 +0800 From: Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com> To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> Cc: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>, Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve intel-hid's self-consistency On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote: >> Commit 2cfa4b311acc ("platform/x86: intel-hid: Support 5 button array") >> contains some coding style cleanups compared to the code it was based >> on. This patch series "backports" these cleanups to the rest of the >> driver in order to make it more self-consistent and removes a redundant >> set_bit() call as a bonus. >> >> This series was not tested on hardware supported by intel-hid. > > Alex, do you have an access to hardware to test? I wouldn't going to > apply this until I get your tag(s) (in the best case > Reviewed-and-tested-by). The patches look good and tested on Latitude 7480 Reviewed-and-tested-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com> > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists