[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4481f84f-22a6-4ee6-9875-d5e03729b6fd@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:53:32 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
"russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" <russianneuromancer@...ru>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Check device status before calling
fix_up_power()
On 25/02/17 19:23, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Calling acpi_device_fix_up_power() on a device which is not present
> is not a good idea.
>
> While at it also call acpi_bus_get_status() on the children before
> the status check to make sure that child->status contains valid data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> index 96465ff..873beae 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> @@ -394,15 +394,15 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + if (acpi_bus_get_status(device) || !device->status.present)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> /* Power on the SDHCI controller and its children */
> acpi_device_fix_up_power(device);
> list_for_each_entry(child, &device->children, node)
> if (child->status.present && child->status.enabled)
> acpi_device_fix_up_power(child);
>
> - if (acpi_bus_get_status(device) || !device->status.present)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> if (sdhci_acpi_byt_defer(dev))
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists