[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4304c447-0523-08a0-3327-e974bedc3c73@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:38:19 +0100
From: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@...e.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfio: type1: conditionally check MSI remapping at irq
domain level
On 03/02/2017 11:24 AM, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/03/2017 11:01, Mian Yousaf Kaukab wrote:
>> Check only if irq domains are available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@...e.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index bd6f293c4ebd..e3ed50e40ead 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -1287,8 +1287,9 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
>> list_add(&group->next, &domain->group_list);
>>
>> - msi_remap = resv_msi ? irq_domain_check_msi_remap() :
>> - iommu_capable(bus, IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP);
>> + msi_remap = resv_msi && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN) ?
>> + irq_domain_check_msi_remap() :
>> + iommu_capable(bus, IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP);
> Is that patch actually needed after [PATCH 1/2] irqdomain: add empty
> irq_domain_check_msi_remap. irq_domain_check_msi_remap() should be
> defined and if you follow my suggestion, would return false. Anyway in
> your case resv_msi should be false.
I agree its an overkill if resv_msi is guaranteed to be false. What I am
unsure about is that, if iommu have IOMMU_RESV_MSI regions that would
mean that irq domains are selected in the build. If this is not
guaranteed, then we need to add this check.
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
BR,
Yousaf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists