| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703051852060.3052@hadrien>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 18:52:21 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, oleg.drokin@...el.com,
andreas.dilger@...el.com, jsimmons@...radead.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 5/5] staging: lustre: osc_page.c: Use
list_for_each_entry_safe
On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> >> > By the way, the above subject line is not correct. Normally one does not
> >> > put .c/.h in the subject line. Indeed, there is not really any
> >> > deterministic algorithm for choosing the subject line. You need to run
> >> > git log --oneline filename to see what others have done.
> >>
> >> So this would be fine Subject:-
> >> staging: lustre: osc_page: Use list_for_each_entry_safe
> >
> > Looking at the result of git log --oneline, I would say:
> >
> > staging: lustre: osc:
> >
> > For example that it what is used by 86df598, which also only changes the
> > file modified by this patch.
> >
> Actually, I can't use this as its already subject of one of a patch of
> this patch
> series.
OK, then what you suggested would be ok.
julia
>
> > julia
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > julia
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, 5 Mar 2017, simran singhal wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Doubly linked lists which are iterated using list_empty
> >> >> and list_entry macros have been replaced with list_for_each_entry_safe
> >> >> macro.
> >> >> This makes the iteration simpler and more readable.
> >> >>
> >> >> This patch replaces the while loop containing list_empty and list_entry
> >> >> with list_for_each_entry_safe.
> >> >>
> >> >> This was done with Coccinelle.
> >> >>
> >> >> @@
> >> >> expression E1;
> >> >> identifier I1, I2;
> >> >> type T;
> >> >> iterator name list_for_each_entry_safe;
> >> >> @@
> >> >>
> >> >> T *I1;
> >> >> + T *tmp;
> >> >> ...
> >> >> - while (list_empty(&E1) == 0)
> >> >> + list_for_each_entry_safe (I1, tmp, &E1, I2)
> >> >> {
> >> >> ...when != T *I1;
> >> >> - I1 = list_entry(E1.next, T, I2);
> >> >> ...
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c | 11 ++++-------
> >> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
> >> >> index ed8a0dc..e8b974f 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/osc_page.c
> >> >> @@ -542,6 +542,7 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli,
> >> >> struct cl_object *clobj = NULL;
> >> >> struct cl_page **pvec;
> >> >> struct osc_page *opg;
> >> >> + struct osc_page *tmp;
> >> >> int maxscan = 0;
> >> >> long count = 0;
> >> >> int index = 0;
> >> >> @@ -572,7 +573,7 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli,
> >> >> if (force)
> >> >> cli->cl_lru_reclaim++;
> >> >> maxscan = min(target << 1, atomic_long_read(&cli->cl_lru_in_list));
> >> >> - while (!list_empty(&cli->cl_lru_list)) {
> >> >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(opg, tmp, &cli->cl_lru_list, ops_lru) {
> >> >> struct cl_page *page;
> >> >> bool will_free = false;
> >> >>
> >> >> @@ -582,8 +583,6 @@ long osc_lru_shrink(const struct lu_env *env, struct client_obd *cli,
> >> >> if (--maxscan < 0)
> >> >> break;
> >> >>
> >> >> - opg = list_entry(cli->cl_lru_list.next, struct osc_page,
> >> >> - ops_lru);
> >> >> page = opg->ops_cl.cpl_page;
> >> >> if (lru_page_busy(cli, page)) {
> >> >> list_move_tail(&opg->ops_lru, &cli->cl_lru_list);
> >> >> @@ -1043,6 +1042,7 @@ unsigned long osc_cache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *sk,
> >> >> {
> >> >> struct client_obd *stop_anchor = NULL;
> >> >> struct client_obd *cli;
> >> >> + struct client_obd *tmp;
> >> >> struct lu_env *env;
> >> >> long shrank = 0;
> >> >> u16 refcheck;
> >> >> @@ -1059,10 +1059,7 @@ unsigned long osc_cache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *sk,
> >> >> return SHRINK_STOP;
> >> >>
> >> >> spin_lock(&osc_shrink_lock);
> >> >> - while (!list_empty(&osc_shrink_list)) {
> >> >> - cli = list_entry(osc_shrink_list.next, struct client_obd,
> >> >> - cl_shrink_list);
> >> >> -
> >> >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(cli, tmp, &osc_shrink_list, cl_shrink_list) {
> >> >> if (!stop_anchor)
> >> >> stop_anchor = cli;
> >> >> else if (cli == stop_anchor)
> >> >> --
> >> >> 2.7.4
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> >> >> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com.
> >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1488733610-22289-6-git-send-email-singhalsimran0%40gmail.com.
> >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >> >>
> >>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists