[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170306070900.GA1372@ozzy.nask.waw.pl>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:09:00 +0100
From: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: sparse-keymap - use a managed allocation for
keymap copy
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> > Some platform drivers use devm_input_allocate_device() together with
> > sparse_keymap_setup() in their .probe callbacks. While using the former
> > simplifies error handling, using the latter necessitates calling
> > sparse_keymap_free() in the error path and upon module unloading to
> > avoid leaking the copy of the keymap allocated by sparse_keymap_setup().
> >
> > To help prevent such leaks and enable simpler error handling, make
> > sparse_keymap_setup() use devm_kcalloc() to allocate memory for the
> > keymap copy so that it gets automatically freed.
>
> > + * Since sparse_keymap_setup() now uses a managed allocation for the
> > + * keymap copy, use of this function is deprecated.
>
> So...
>
> > */
> > void sparse_keymap_free(struct input_dev *dev)
>
> ... add __deprecated then?
Sure, I can do that if Dmitry recognizes this patch as otherwise sane.
I have never used that attribute before, so thanks for the tip.
--
Best regards,
Michał Kępień
Powered by blists - more mailing lists