[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b98f762-ca72-1f6a-6f28-d42138389df7@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:19:33 -0700
From: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
To: David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>,
"scott.bauer@...el.com" <scott.bauer@...el.com>,
"rafael.antognolli@...el.com" <rafael.antognolli@...el.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: block/sed-opal.c: 2 * bad if tests ?
On 03/06/2017 05:00 AM, David Binderman wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> 1.
>
> block/sed-opal.c:2136:40: warning: logical ‘and’ of mutually exclusive tests is always false [-Wlogical-op]
>
> Source code is
>
> if (lk_unlk->session.who < OPAL_USER1 &&
> lk_unlk->session.who > OPAL_USER9) {
>
> 2.
>
> block/sed-opal.c:2319:37: warning: logical ‘and’ of mutually exclusive tests is always false [-Wlogical-op]
>
> if (opal_session->who < OPAL_USER1 &&
> opal_session->who > OPAL_USER9) {
>
> Duplicate.
>
> Also in the same file:
>
> [block/sed-opal.c:1034]: (style) Variable 'method' is assigned a value that is never used.
>
> Regards
>
> David Binderman
>
Thanks for the catch(es). Will provide patch shortly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists