lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170307124034.59b5b763@bbrezillon>
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:40:34 +0100
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: fix write accessor sanity checks

On Tue,  7 Mar 2017 20:23:59 +0900
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:

> If the higher level accessor chip->write_page() is implemented,
> ecc->write_page() and ecc->write_page_raw() are not required.

I'm about to remove the chip->write_page() hook [1], I hope you're not
planning to use it.

[1]https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/729966/

> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index a3c0f47..c32e700 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -4585,11 +4585,12 @@ static bool invalid_ecc_page_accessors(struct nand_chip *chip)
>  	 * default helpers are not suitable when the core does not
>  	 * send the READ0/PAGEPROG commands.
>  	 */
> -	return (!ecc->read_page || !ecc->write_page ||
> -		!ecc->read_page_raw || !ecc->write_page_raw ||
> +	return !ecc->read_page || !ecc->read_page_raw ||
>  		(NAND_HAS_SUBPAGE_READ(chip) && !ecc->read_subpage) ||
> -		(NAND_HAS_SUBPAGE_WRITE(chip) && !ecc->write_subpage &&
> -		 ecc->hwctl && ecc->calculate));
> +		(!chip->write_page &&
> +		 (!ecc->write_page || !ecc->write_page_raw ||
> +		  (NAND_HAS_SUBPAGE_WRITE(chip) && !ecc->write_subpage &&
> +		   ecc->hwctl && ecc->calculate)));
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -4699,8 +4700,9 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  		if ((!ecc->calculate || !ecc->correct || !ecc->hwctl) &&
>  		    (!ecc->read_page ||
>  		     ecc->read_page == nand_read_page_hwecc ||
> -		     !ecc->write_page ||
> -		     ecc->write_page == nand_write_page_hwecc)) {
> +		     (!chip->write_page &&
> +		      (!ecc->write_page ||
> +		       ecc->write_page == nand_write_page_hwecc)))) {
>  			WARN(1, "No ECC functions supplied; hardware ECC not possible\n");
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto err_free;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ