linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf probe: Remove stale func add_perf_probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:28:08 +0530
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf probe: Remove stale func add_perf_probe_events

Thanks Masami for the review,

On Wednesday 08 March 2017 03:13 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Wed,  8 Mar 2017 12:29:08 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't see any user of this function. This function was being copied
>> to tools/perf/builtin-probe.c by commit b02137cc6550 ("perf probe: Move
>> print logic into cmd_probe()"). Since then it has became stale.
> Hmm, I have intended to keep it as an library API, which allows 
> user to add event silently (e.g. adding sdt event in background).

Makes sense. Dropping it.

-Ravi