[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVrNMY41k2arM_sZc3cWh+Ac0anRzRLuk8B3PDi8v+i2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:52:47 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/09] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Make use of IOMMU_OF_DECLARE()
Hi Magnus,
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>
>
> Hook up IOMMU_OF_DECLARE() support in case CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA
> is enabled. The only current supported case for 32-bit ARM
> is disabled, however for 64-bit ARM usage of OF is required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se
While I'm not such a big fan of *_OF_DECLARE() (it doesn't support deferred
probing, which is needed for any device with dependencies, like clocks and
power domains), what's the rationale for not using IOMMU_OF_DECLARE()
on arm32, and thus the need for setup_done?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists