[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a991323-1059-5f3c-0aa3-0ab0cb7bd3f1@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:25:24 +0100
From: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Report smmu type in dmesg
On 03/06/2017 02:58 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> The ARM SMMU detection especially depends from system firmware. For
> better diagnostic, log the detected type in dmesg.
>
> The smmu type's name is now stored in struct arm_smmu_type and ACPI
> code is modified to use that struct too. Rename ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA()
> macro to ARM_SMMU_TYPE() for better readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index abf6496843a6..5c793b3d3173 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
> u32 options;
> enum arm_smmu_arch_version version;
> enum arm_smmu_implementation model;
> + const char *name;
>
> u32 num_context_banks;
> u32 num_s2_context_banks;
> @@ -1955,19 +1956,20 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -struct arm_smmu_match_data {
> +struct arm_smmu_type {
> enum arm_smmu_arch_version version;
> enum arm_smmu_implementation model;
> + const char *name;
> };
>
> -#define ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(name, ver, imp) \
> -static struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, .model = imp }
> +#define ARM_SMMU_TYPE(var, ver, imp, _name) \
> +static struct arm_smmu_type var = { .version = ver, .model = imp, .name = _name }
Can we infer the _name from the name of var?
#define ARM_SMMU_TYPE(var, ver, imp) \
static struct arm_smmu_type var = { .version = ver, .model = imp, .name = #var }
> -ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v1, ARM_SMMU_V1, GENERIC_SMMU);
> -ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v2, ARM_SMMU_V2, GENERIC_SMMU);
> -ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(arm_mmu401, ARM_SMMU_V1_64K, GENERIC_SMMU);
> -ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(arm_mmu500, ARM_SMMU_V2, ARM_MMU500);
> -ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(cavium_smmuv2, ARM_SMMU_V2, CAVIUM_SMMUV2);
> +ARM_SMMU_TYPE(smmu_generic_v1, ARM_SMMU_V1, GENERIC_SMMU, "smmu-generic-v1");
> +ARM_SMMU_TYPE(smmu_generic_v2, ARM_SMMU_V2, GENERIC_SMMU, "smmu-generic-v2");
> +ARM_SMMU_TYPE(arm_mmu401, ARM_SMMU_V1_64K, GENERIC_SMMU, "arm-mmu401");
> +ARM_SMMU_TYPE(arm_mmu500, ARM_SMMU_V2, ARM_MMU500, "arm-mmu500");
> +ARM_SMMU_TYPE(cavium_smmuv2, ARM_SMMU_V2, CAVIUM_SMMUV2, "cavium-smmuv2");
So that this change will not be required?
Thank you
Aleksey Makarov
> static const struct of_device_id arm_smmu_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "arm,smmu-v1", .data = &smmu_generic_v1 },
> @@ -1981,29 +1983,19 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_smmu_of_match[] = {
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smmu_of_match);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -static int acpi_smmu_get_data(u32 model, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +static struct arm_smmu_type *acpi_smmu_get_type(u32 model)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> switch (model) {
> case ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V1:
> case ACPI_IORT_SMMU_CORELINK_MMU400:
> - smmu->version = ARM_SMMU_V1;
> - smmu->model = GENERIC_SMMU;
> - break;
> + return &smmu_generic_v1;
> case ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V2:
> - smmu->version = ARM_SMMU_V2;
> - smmu->model = GENERIC_SMMU;
> - break;
> + return &smmu_generic_v2;
> case ACPI_IORT_SMMU_CORELINK_MMU500:
> - smmu->version = ARM_SMMU_V2;
> - smmu->model = ARM_MMU500;
> - break;
> - default:
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> + return &arm_mmu500;
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> static int arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> @@ -2013,14 +2005,18 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct acpi_iort_node *node =
> *(struct acpi_iort_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> struct acpi_iort_smmu *iort_smmu;
> - int ret;
> + struct arm_smmu_type *type;
>
> /* Retrieve SMMU1/2 specific data */
> iort_smmu = (struct acpi_iort_smmu *)node->node_data;
>
> - ret = acpi_smmu_get_data(iort_smmu->model, smmu);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + type = acpi_smmu_get_type(iort_smmu->model);
> + if (!type)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + smmu->version = type->version;
> + smmu->model = type->model;
> + smmu->name = type->name;
>
> /* Ignore the configuration access interrupt */
> smmu->num_global_irqs = 1;
> @@ -2041,8 +2037,8 @@ static inline int arm_smmu_device_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> - const struct arm_smmu_match_data *data;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + const struct arm_smmu_type *type;
> bool legacy_binding;
>
> if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "#global-interrupts",
> @@ -2051,9 +2047,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> - smmu->version = data->version;
> - smmu->model = data->model;
> + type = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + smmu->version = type->version;
> + smmu->model = type->model;
> + smmu->name = type->name;
>
> parse_driver_options(smmu);
>
> @@ -2098,6 +2095,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + dev_notice(dev, "%s detected", smmu->name);
> +
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> ioaddr = res->start;
> smmu->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists