[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrX4D13Q4LRxGrQzXQCWvaRpq7sG0ws8CpB_bM4rKQ4W_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:06:23 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Liang Z Li <liang.z.li@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...ehq.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-msdos@...r.kernel.org,
wine-devel@...ehq.org
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 00/21] x86: Enable User-Mode Instruction Prevention
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru> wrote:
> 08.03.2017 03:32, Ricardo Neri пишет:
>>
>> These are the instructions covered by UMIP:
>> * SGDT - Store Global Descriptor Table
>> * SIDT - Store Interrupt Descriptor Table
>> * SLDT - Store Local Descriptor Table
>> * SMSW - Store Machine Status Word
>> * STR - Store Task Register
>>
>> This patchset initially treated tasks running in virtual-8086 mode as a
>> special case. However, I received clarification that DOSEMU[8] does not
>> support applications that use these instructions.
Can you remind me what was special about it? It looks like you still
emulate them in v8086 mode.
>
> Yes, this is the case.
> But at least in the past there was an attempt to
> support SLDT as it is used by an ancient pharlap
> DOS extender (currently unsupported by dosemu1/2).
> So how difficult would it be to add an optional
> possibility of delivering such SIGSEGV to userspace
> so that the kernel's dummy emulation can be overridden?
> It doesn't need to be a matter of this particular
> patch set, i.e. this proposal should not trigger a
> v7 resend of all 21 patches. :) But it would be useful
> for the future development of dosemu2.
What I'd actually like to see is a totally separate patchset that adds
an inheritable (but reset on exec) per-task mask of legacy
compatibility features to disable. Maybe:
sys_adjust_compat_mask(int op, int word, u32 mask);
op could indicate that we want to so SET, OR, AND, or READ. word
would be 0 for now. It could be a prctl, too.
Things in the mask could include:
COMPAT_MASK0_X86_64_VSYSCALL [1]
COMPAT_MASK0_X86_UMIP_FIXUP
I'm sure I could think of more along these lines.
Then DOSEMU (and future WINE versions, too) could just mask off
X86_UMIP_FIXUP and do their own emulation
[1] For those of you thinking about this and realizing that VSYSCALL
readability is inherently global and not per-task, I know how to fix
that for essentially no cost :)
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists