[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a88vuf9p.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:37:38 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> On 2017/03/08 11:29AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > I wasn't sure if you were planning on picking up KPROBES_ON_FTRACE for
>> > v4.11. If so, it would be good to take this patch through the powerpc
>> > tree. Otherwise, this can go via Ingo's tree.
>>
>> If you guys convince Ingo that this should go _now_, then just cherry
>> pick what was merged into tip/perf/core that is needed for the arch
>> specific stuff and go from there.
>
> Ok, in hindsight, I think Michael's concern was actually for v4.12
Yes I was talking about 4.12, sorry I thought that was implied :)
> itself, in which case this particular patch can go via powerpc tree,
> while the rest of the patches in this series can go via your tree.
>
> Michael?
Yeah I think that's the easiest option. The function will be temporarily
unused until the two trees are merged, but I think that's fine.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists