linux-kernel - Re: [net/bpf] 3051bf36c2 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000a7cf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58C16C6A.2060400@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Thu, 09 Mar 2017 15:53:30 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
        ast@...com, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net/bpf] 3051bf36c2 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
 at 0000a7cf

On 03/09/2017 02:25 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/09/2017 02:10 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> With regard to CPA_FLUSHTLB that Linus mentioned, when I investigated
>>> code paths in change_page_attr_set_clr(), I did see that CPA_FLUSHTLB
>>> was set each time we switched attrs and a cpa_flush_range() was
>>> performed (with the correct number of pages and cache set to 0). That
>>> would be a __flush_tlb_all() eventually.
>>>
>>> Hmm, it indeed might seem likely that this could be an emulation bug.
>>
>> Which variant of __flush_tlb_all() is used when the test fails?
>>
>> Check for the following flags in /proc/cpuinfo: pge invpcid
>
> I added the following and booted with both variants:
>
> printk("X86_FEATURE_PGE:%u\n",     static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PGE));
> printk("X86_FEATURE_INVPCID:%u\n", static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVPCID));
>
> "-cpu host" gives:
>
> [    8.326117] X86_FEATURE_PGE:1
> [    8.326381] X86_FEATURE_INVPCID:1
>
> "-cpu kvm64" gives:
>
> [    8.517069] X86_FEATURE_PGE:1
> [    8.517393] X86_FEATURE_INVPCID:0

Fwiw, I tried switching from using cr4 (__native_flush_tlb_global_irq_disabled())
to slower cr3 (__native_flush_tlb()) in "-cpu kvm64" mode, and it looks like it
also lets all test cases pass (rodata_test, test_setmem, test_bpf), no corruption
happening, etc.

Test diff used:

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 6fa8594..34f4582 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -188,9 +188,9 @@ static inline void __native_flush_tlb_single(unsigned long addr)

  static inline void __flush_tlb_all(void)
  {
-       if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PGE))
-               __flush_tlb_global();
-       else
+//     if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PGE))
+//             __flush_tlb_global();
+//     else
                 __flush_tlb();
  }