linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAeU0aN6615BUP+ikqZeTm1=BSEN48uDu3Ucz8o9QrmETnkHSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2017 20:35:43 -0800
From:   Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:

>
> Talked to Tejun about this as well, and we both agree that the splitting
> this into separate init/alloc paths would be much cleaner. I can't
> apply the current patch, sorry, it's just too ugly to live.

Do you mean, you prefer the approach that was taken in v1 patch or
something else?