linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c514c076-18ea-8605-d439-e46730aa29e0@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:32:56 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue
 spinlock

On 03/11/2017 09:35 PM, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Talked to Tejun about this as well, and we both agree that the splitting
>> this into separate init/alloc paths would be much cleaner. I can't
>> apply the current patch, sorry, it's just too ugly to live.
> 
> Do you mean, you prefer the approach that was taken in v1 patch or
> something else?

I can no longer find v1 of the patch, just v2 and on. Can you send a
link to it?

-- 
Jens Axboe