linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] PM / Domains: Do not check if simple providers have phandle cells

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoEeErp7heeKK1UgcH=XU-LYyJUsRqH60cJzb5YyTY6gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 09:20:43 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] PM / Domains: Do not check if simple providers
 have phandle cells

On 7 March 2017 at 11:22, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com> wrote:
> There is no reason that a platform genpd driver registered using
> of_genpd_add_provider_simple needs to be constrained to having no cells
> in the "power-domains" phandle. Currently the genpd framework will fail
> if any arguments are passed with for a simple provider but the framework
> does not actually care, so remove the check for phandle argument count.
>
> This will allow greater flexibility for genpd providers to use their own
> arguments that are passed in the phandle and interpret them however they
> see fit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>

> ---
> v3->v4:
>  Drop ti,sci-id device property and instead describe using phandle cell
>  for id.
>
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index e697dec9d25b..8e0550c27394 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -1622,8 +1622,6 @@ static struct generic_pm_domain *genpd_xlate_simple(
>                                         struct of_phandle_args *genpdspec,
>                                         void *data)
>  {
> -       if (genpdspec->args_count != 0)
> -               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>         return data;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.11.0
>