lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170313115129.GC4136@mwanda>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:51:29 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: atomisp: use k{v}zalloc instead of k{v}alloc
 and memset

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 07:54:21PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
> If the atomisp_kernel_zalloc() has "true" as a second parameter, it
> tries to allocate zeroing memory from kmalloc(vmalloc) and memset.
> But using kzalloc is rather than kmalloc followed by memset with 0.
> (vzalloc is for same reason with kzalloc)
> 
> And also atomisp_kernel_malloc() can be used with
> atomisp_kernel_zalloc(<size>, false);
> 

We should just change all the callers to kvmalloc() and kvzmalloc().

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ