lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHb8M2BOcuW8ToYTT3EUm-GieOMz6+xUhmzwW+3hbygti11k0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2017 23:07:22 +0900
From:   DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, devel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: atomisp: use k{v}zalloc instead of k{v}alloc and memset

2017-03-13 20:51 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 07:54:21PM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> If the atomisp_kernel_zalloc() has "true" as a second parameter, it
>> tries to allocate zeroing memory from kmalloc(vmalloc) and memset.
>> But using kzalloc is rather than kmalloc followed by memset with 0.
>> (vzalloc is for same reason with kzalloc)
>>
>> And also atomisp_kernel_malloc() can be used with
>> atomisp_kernel_zalloc(<size>, false);
>>
>
> We should just change all the callers to kvmalloc() and kvzmalloc().
ok. I will try to change all the callers to kvmalloc() and kvzalloc().

Thanks.
Regards,
Daeseok Youn
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ