linux-kernel - Re: [1/2] coresight: Disable the path only when the source is disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLsYkyymMScBu7EBdndPo1Yk_okCQOGEx_JQyv4VtnsHy_SXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:37:52 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
Cc:     Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [1/2] coresight: Disable the path only when the source is disabled

Hi Suzuki,

On 14 March 2017 at 11:31, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
>
> With a coresight tracing session, the components along the path
> from the source to sink are disabled after the source is disabled.
> However, if the source was not actually disabled due to active
> users, we should not disable the components in the path.
>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
> index 0c37356..34cd1ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int coresight_enable_source(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static void coresight_disable_source(struct coresight_device *csdev)
> +/* coresight_disable_source: Returns true if the device has been disabled */

To be coherent with the rest of the file please use:

/*
 * coresight_disable_source: Returns true if the device has been disabled
 */

I would have done the modification myself but 2/2 needs tending as well.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> +static bool coresight_disable_source(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>  {
>         if (atomic_dec_return(csdev->refcnt) == 0) {
>                 if (source_ops(csdev)->disable) {
> @@ -261,6 +262,7 @@ static void coresight_disable_source(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>                         csdev->enable = false;
>                 }
>         }
> +       return !csdev->enable;
>  }
>
>  void coresight_disable_path(struct list_head *path)
> @@ -629,7 +631,7 @@ void coresight_disable(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>         if (ret)
>                 goto out;
>
> -       if (!csdev->enable)
> +       if (!csdev->enable || !coresight_disable_source(csdev))
>                 goto out;
>
>         switch (csdev->subtype.source_subtype) {
> @@ -647,7 +649,6 @@ void coresight_disable(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>                 break;
>         }
>
> -       coresight_disable_source(csdev);
>         coresight_disable_path(path);
>         coresight_release_path(path);
>