lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:08:59 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc:     Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
        Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: Print kernel pointers in a restricted form

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:01:41PM +0100, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> I was wondering about the benefit of this. From a quick look these are
> all messages that end up in the kernel log / dmesg.
> 
> IIRC %pK does nothing there, since dmest_restrict is supposed to be used
> to deny an unpriviliged user the access to the kernel log.
> 
> Or am I missing something here?

These are regular printks so depending on kernel options (e.g. dynamic
debug, drm.debug) these might be printed also in the console. Of course
we could argue then if access to one of the consoles is worth
securing.

Actually, I think that we should get rid of printing of these kernel
pointers entirely...


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ