[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPeFw-qRcznSvw-+ZYxObXTPjE4bRM37=sGf8aWbR31WEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 13:02:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h
header
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> The MFD-specific header will go away because it duplicates defines from
>> exynos-regs-pmu.h.
>>
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Applied, thanks.
Hi,
This is also needed for patch 5/5 in the set so I was wondering if
this can be put on separate branch and then shared if phy maintainers
would need it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists