[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170315121212.p2xu64dzhrzmjbxv@dell>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:12:12 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common
soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h header
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> >> The MFD-specific header will go away because it duplicates defines from
> >> exynos-regs-pmu.h.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
>
> Hi,
>
> This is also needed for patch 5/5 in the set so I was wondering if
> this can be put on separate branch and then shared if phy maintainers
> would need it?
What is the dependency?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists