linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfZv5yVMHV2wQfgPp8Vy8aQvq_DartX_hPG5jG4U_Mn7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:15:28 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h
 header

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> >
>> >> The MFD-specific header will go away because it duplicates defines from
>> >> exynos-regs-pmu.h.
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> >> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 4 ++--
>> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Applied, thanks.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is also needed for patch 5/5 in the set so I was wondering if
>> this can be put on separate branch and then shared if phy maintainers
>> would need it?
>
> What is the dependency?

This patch removes the last usage of define from header we want to
remove (linux/mfd/syscon/exynos5-pmu.h). The next patch (5/5) removes
the header as there are no more users.

BTW, I hope you got all the mails from this patchset including cover letter.

Best regards,
Krzysztof