lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v67-b+8CM0MqhT_YQeuNxEnVoxG-COZPy8LW32Eb-QE67Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:15:22 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Mylène Josserand 
        <mylene.josserand@...e-electrons.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Applied "ASoC: sun8i-codec: Update mixer to use SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE"
 to the asoc tree

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:31:22PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>> This patch changes the mixer controls exposed to user space.
>
>> This driver was just introduced in 4.11-rc1. Would it make sense to
>> merge these cleanup patches as fixes for 4.11, so we don't affect
>> userspace across kernel releases?
>
> It would but it doesn't pick over cleanly, it looks like it depends on
> some of the other changes.

It depends on the second half of commit 4aa8146c89f3 ("ASoC: sun8i-codec:
Remove analog "HP" widget"), which is also a cleanup. Would it be OK
to pick these two over to fixes then? Or should we send a clean version
instead?

ChenYu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ