[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170316140653.jjnta4le6kws36l5@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:06:53 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Mylène Josserand
<mylene.josserand@...e-electrons.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Applied "ASoC: sun8i-codec: Update mixer to use SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE"
to the asoc tree
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:15:22PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> It depends on the second half of commit 4aa8146c89f3 ("ASoC: sun8i-codec:
> Remove analog "HP" widget"), which is also a cleanup. Would it be OK
> to pick these two over to fixes then? Or should we send a clean version
> instead?
That also doesn't pick over cleanly, can you send a new version against
Linus' tree, that'll be easiest and safest I think.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists