linux-kernel - Re: kbuild/mkspec: Fix architectures where KBUILD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170315153755.GR19897@bill-the-cat>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:37:55 -0400
From:   Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
To:     Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: kbuild/mkspec: Fix architectures where KBUILD_IMAGE isn't a full
 path

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > it was brought up again just before I sent my patch.  I just want to
> > point out that 9442211 doesn't address arm, arc, and sh and they will
> > still not have a functional rpm build target.  This is at least probably
> > important for arm.  Of course all of those could also be addressed with
> > a patch similar to 9442211, and my main concern is making sure
> > everything gets fixed one way or another.  Thanks!
> 
> The patch is 1/6 of a series that also covers other architectures, but
> patchwork won't should you the rest of the thread. Have a look here for
> instance: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/22/750.

Ah, OK, thanks.  I'll just hope it gets in soon, I like being able to
easily drop new kernels in on my arm64 box :)

-- 
Tom

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)