[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170320101315.GB17263@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:13:15 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: kbuild/mkspec: Fix architectures where KBUILD_IMAGE isn't a full
path
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:37:55AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> > Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > > it was brought up again just before I sent my patch. I just want to
> > > point out that 9442211 doesn't address arm, arc, and sh and they will
> > > still not have a functional rpm build target. This is at least probably
> > > important for arm. Of course all of those could also be addressed with
> > > a patch similar to 9442211, and my main concern is making sure
> > > everything gets fixed one way or another. Thanks!
> >
> > The patch is 1/6 of a series that also covers other architectures, but
> > patchwork won't should you the rest of the thread. Have a look here for
> > instance: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/22/750.
>
> Ah, OK, thanks. I'll just hope it gets in soon, I like being able to
> easily drop new kernels in on my arm64 box :)
I'll pick up the arm64 patch this week (I was on holiday last week).
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists