linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: add dio2125 amplifier support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170315170750.pw3552bwc6fwwpwg@rob-hp-laptop>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:07:50 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: add dio2125 amplifier support

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:00:20AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:26:17PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> 
> Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
> readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
> you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
> discussion is being addressed.
> 
> > In this series, you applied patch 2 and 3 but not patch 1.
> > (so the dioo prefix is used but not documented)
> 
> > Is it on purpose ?
> > The patch does not have the "ASoC" prefix, this maybe why it was
> > missed. Since, the file does no belong to alsa, I wasn't sure whether
> > to put the prefix or not.
> 
> This is a generic DT patch, not part of the bindings, so I'd expect the
> DT maintainers to take it.

I usually don't if it's part of a series, but I have applied it.

Rob