linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: add dio2125 amplifier support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170308100020.dop5pno3m2sj6fmv@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:00:20 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ASoC: add dio2125 amplifier support

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:26:17PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> Hi Mark,

Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
discussion is being addressed.

> In this series, you applied patch 2 and 3 but not patch 1.
> (so the dioo prefix is used but not documented)

> Is it on purpose ?
> The patch does not have the "ASoC" prefix, this maybe why it was
> missed. Since, the file does no belong to alsa, I wasn't sure whether
> to put the prefix or not.

This is a generic DT patch, not part of the bindings, so I'd expect the
DT maintainers to take it.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)