linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc1D7EYS0chi6nuZQzsqeLMZJEE6wwNayZhm=AKjuJFWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:43:44 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@....samsung.com> wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
> On 03/15/2017 08:21 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>> <javier@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/15/2017 04:58 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately some maintainers do and don't accept patches adding I2C tables
>>> only to have module autoloading working so I still think it should be fixed.
>>
>> Wait, how does it work for now?!

> It only works if you have an I2C device ID table, but that may not be the case
> for DT-only drivers that could only have an OF device ID table. In the latter
> case module autoload won't work.

OK.

>> Sounds for me you are trying to solve non-existing issue.

> It's an existing issue. You _must_ have an I2C device ID table if you want to
> autload a device driver which is superfluous for DT-only drivers.

Okay, can you scope only affected drivers then? Looking to spread
patches from you over all drivers I dunno they are all affected right
now.

P.S. Personally I agree with maintainers who do *not* apply this. Sorry.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko