linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5e14721e-57af-b009-06d6-9cd27391b9d9@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:47:13 +0800
From:   "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack

Hi Wolff,

Thanks so much for your review comments!

I just send out the v5 patch series. The patch series are updated 
according to your comments.

Thanks

Jin Yao

On 3/14/2017 8:59 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Friday, March 3, 2017 11:43:00 AM CET Jin Yao wrote:
>> v4: Remove the options "--inline-line" and "--inline-name". Just use
>>      a new option "--inline" to print the inline function information.
>>      The policy is if the inline function name can be resolved then
>>      print the name in priority. If the name can't be resolved, then
>>      print the source line number.
> This is still wrong from a usability POV. I may want to see the file/line for
> entry that have a name. And actually, there are afaik no situations where you
> could have a file/line but not a symbol name.
>
> Again, why don't you align this with the other non-inlined frames, and honor
> the grouping setting? Check whether we group by address (then display file/
> line), or by function (then display the function name).
>
> Bye