linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: Add max11801-ts binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170320074303.GF3443@dragon>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:43:05 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc:     Jagan Teki <jagan@...nedev.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] dt-bindings: input: touchscreen: Add max11801-ts
 binding

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:55:27AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> >> +* MAXI MAX11801 Resistive touch screen controller with i2c interface
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +- compatible: must be "max11801"
> >
> > Shouldn't it have a vendor prefix?
> 
> Drivers i2c_device_id.name doesn't have vendor prefix, should I fix
> that one as well?

No.  The vendor prefix is only needed for device tree compatible.

Shawn