linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8fc9171f-15b7-2c6a-d0b5-3af21cc88405@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:04:38 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
        <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver

Hi,

On Tuesday 14 March 2017 10:06 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>

There are some checkpatch suggestions that are worth fixing, I think.

[PATCH v2 1_3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> - 2017-03-14 2206.eml:277: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
[PATCH v2 1_3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> - 2017-03-14 2206.eml:320: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
[PATCH v2 1_3] ata: add Palmchip BK3710 PATA controller driver - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> - 2017-03-14 2206.eml:489: CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!mem"

Thanks,
Sekhar