linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170321172700.GC21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:27:00 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, tom.cooksey@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:36:14PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> +static struct amba_driver pl111_amba_driver = {
> +	.drv = {
> +		.name = "clcd-pl11x",

either:

		.name = "clcd-pl111",

or:

		.name = "drm-clcd-pl111",

otherwise the driver names will clash in sysfs - driver names must be
unique.

> +	},
> +	.probe = pl111_amba_probe,
> +	.remove = pl111_amba_remove,
> +	.id_table = pl111_id_table,
> +};
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
> +
> +module_amba_driver(pl111_amba_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC);
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("ARM Ltd.");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pl111_drm");

Does the platform alias make sense for an OF-only driver?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.