linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zige1kow.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:41:51 -0700
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, tom.cooksey@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111

Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:36:14PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> +static struct amba_driver pl111_amba_driver = {
>> +	.drv = {
>> +		.name = "clcd-pl11x",
>
> either:
>
> 		.name = "clcd-pl111",
>
> or:
>
> 		.name = "drm-clcd-pl111",
>
> otherwise the driver names will clash in sysfs - driver names must be
> unique.
>
>> +	},
>> +	.probe = pl111_amba_probe,
>> +	.remove = pl111_amba_remove,
>> +	.id_table = pl111_id_table,
>> +};
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
>> +
>> +module_amba_driver(pl111_amba_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC);
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("ARM Ltd.");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pl111_drm");
>
> Does the platform alias make sense for an OF-only driver?

Not sure, this is left over from the original submission.

If I renamed to drm-clcd-pl111 and dropped the alias, would that get
your ack?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)