lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170322104900.GE8329@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:49:00 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To:     Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gang.wei@...el.com,
        hpa@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        ning.sun@...el.com, srihan@...com, alex.eydelberg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86/tboot: add an option to disable iommu force on

Hi Shaohua,

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:37:51AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> IOMMU harms performance signficantly when we run very fast networking
> workloads. This is a limitation in hardware based on our observation, so
> we'd like to disable the IOMMU force on, but we do want to use TBOOT and
> we can sacrifice the DMA security bought by IOMMU. I must admit I know
> nothing about TBOOT, but TBOOT guys (cc-ed) think not eabling IOMMU is
> totally ok.

Can you elaborate a bit more on the setup where the IOMMU still harms
network performance? With the recent scalability improvements I measured
only a minimal impact on 10GBit networking.



	Joerg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ