linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] x86/tboot: add an option to disable iommu force on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:50:56 -0400
From:   Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gang.wei@...el.com>,
        <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, <mingo@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        <ning.sun@...el.com>, <srihan@...com>, <alex.eydelberg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86/tboot: add an option to disable iommu force on

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:49:00AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Shaohua,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:37:51AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > IOMMU harms performance signficantly when we run very fast networking
> > workloads. This is a limitation in hardware based on our observation, so
> > we'd like to disable the IOMMU force on, but we do want to use TBOOT and
> > we can sacrifice the DMA security bought by IOMMU. I must admit I know
> > nothing about TBOOT, but TBOOT guys (cc-ed) think not eabling IOMMU is
> > totally ok.
> 
> Can you elaborate a bit more on the setup where the IOMMU still harms
> network performance? With the recent scalability improvements I measured
> only a minimal impact on 10GBit networking.
Hi,

It's 40GB networking doing XDP test. Software overhead is almost unaware, but
it's the IOTLB miss (based on our analysis) which kills the performance. We
observed the same performance issue even with software passthrough (identity
mapping), only the hardware passthrough survives. The pps with iommu (with
software passthrough) is only about ~30% of that without it.

Thanks,
Shaohua